Is
DTH superior to cable TV?
Yes. DTH offers
better quality picture than cable
TV. This is because cable TV in India
is analog. Despite digital transmission
and reception, the cable transmission
is still analog. DTH offers stereophonic
sound effects. It can also reach remote
areas where terrestrial transmission
and cable TV have failed to penetrate.
Apart from enhanced picture quality,
DTH has also allows for interactive
TV services such as movie-on-demand,
Internet access, video conferencing
and e-mail. But the thing that DTH
has going for it is that the powerful
broadcasting companies like Star,
Zee, etc are pushing for it.
So why are
broadcasters pushing for DTH?
In DTH, the
payments will be made directly by
the subscriber to the satellite company
offering the service.
A big problem
that broadcasters face in India is
the issue of under-reporting of subscribers
by cable operators.
Consider the
cable operators pyramid. Right at
the top is the broadcaster. Next comes
the Multi Service Cable Operator (MSOs)
like Siticable, InCable, etc. Below
them are the Access Cable Operators
(ACOs) or your local cable guy who
actually lays the wires to your house.
The local cable
operators or the ACOs then allegedly
under-report the number of subscribers
they have bagged because they have
to pay the MSOs something like Rs
30-45 per household. Showing a lesser
number of households benefits ACOs.
With no way
to actually cross check, the MSOs
and the broadcasters lose a lot. Broadcasters
do not earn much in subscription fees
and are mostly dependent on advertisement
revenue to cover their costs, which
is not sustainable and does not offer
high growth in revenues for broadcasters.
The way out
of this is to use a set-top box so
that it will be clear how many households
are actually using cable or going
for DTH where broadcasters directly
connect to consumers and can actually
grow revenues with a growth in the
subscriber base.
Why do Doordarshan,
Zee, Star think DTH will work in India?
Today, broadcasters
believe that the market is ripe for
DTH. The prices of the dish and the
set-top box have come down significantly.
Overall investments required in putting
up a DTH infrastructure has dropped
and customers are also reaping the
benefits of more attractive tariffs.
The major thing
that DTH operators are betting on
is that the service is coming at a
time when the government is pushing
for CAS (conditional access system),
which will make cable television more
expensive, narrowing the tariff gap
between DTH and cable.
Will DTH be
cheaper than cable or more expensive?
DTH will be
definitely more expensive than cable
as it exists today.
A set-top box
is a must for DTH. Earlier, when CAS
made set-top box mandatory for households,
the costs between DTH and cable would
not have been too wide.
But CAS on
the backburner now -- which means
no set-top box (a must for DTH), the
price gap between DTH and cable will
be wide.
In Oct 2002,
Siticable, which is owned by Zee,
said that the cost of the installation
equipment, which includes the receiver
dish and the set-top box, would be
priced at around Rs 3,900. Siticable
is looking to rope in 1 million subscribers
in 15 months.
Other estimates
say that digital cable set-top box
may cost Rs 4,000, a DTH decoder dish
is unlikely to cost less than Rs 7,000.
DTH's minimum
subscription could be priced around
Rs 200 per month.
Some reports
say that an entry level DTH STB will
cost about Rs 7,000 (including taxes
and installation cost at consumers
end). A more advanced STB with value
added features like PVR (Personal
Video Recorder), PSTN connectivity,
Gamming console, channel management
system, etc. may cost as much as Rs
15,000.
What is the
history of DTH in India?
DTH services
were first proposed in India in 1996.
But they did not pass approval because
there were concerns over national
security and a cultural invasion.
In 1997, the government even imposed
a ban when the Rupert Murdoch-owned
Indian Sky Broadcasting (ISkyB) was
about to launch its DTH services in
India.
Finally in
2000, DTH was allowed. The new policy
requires all operators to set up earth
stations in India within 12 months
of getting a license. DTH licenses
in India will cost $2.14 million and
will be valid for 10 years. The companies
offering DTH service will have to
have an Indian chief and foreign equity
has been capped at 49 per cent. There
is no limit on the number of companies
that can apply for the DTH license.
So, what's
the buzz? Will DTH finally be the
one that rules?
The cable system
is well entrenched in India and is
showing quite rapid growth. If DTH
had come to India in 1996-97 (like
Star had originally attempted), then
it could have made a significant breakthrough.
Europe is an
example of this. DTH developed there
before cable and now controls nearly
80 per cent of the total satellite
television subscriber base. But in
US, cable rules because it came before
DTH.
DTH will definitely
cut into the existing cable user base.
It will make the local cable operator
less important and take business away
from him. It will give consumers greater
choice.
But it is likely
to be an up market premium product
and most middle class households will
stick to cable.